As these blogs progress, you know you will be seeing some
legs that are a bit similar those I have already covered in my previous 27
Posts, so it is not always easy to find something significantly different.
But I included 5 bottle openers in my post last month, so
I’ve dug out another 5, this time some more Pipe Tampers. I have previously
covered 19 of the 48 legs in my collection, but as it is only in exceptional
circumstances that I repeat a style or size, or shape or material, I have found
another 5 which will have SOME variations!
Just as a recap, Brass is a mixture of copper and zinc,
and this leg will be produced using a mould into which a mixture will be poured.
The mould will be in 2 pieces, joined to hold the liquid brass mix inside; it
will set, and any required engraving and fettling (removing rough bits) plus
polishing will be carried out to produce the end product. So, it’s solid – well this one is. In other words,
it is the mould that the artist creates, not the end product.
No 2. Going to the other extreme the next one is one of my
two most expensive. (I’m not saying how much!!) This one (No 36 in my collection)
I bought at the NEC in 2012. It is made of Bone as can be seen by the dark
flecks in the surface. I’m afraid I do not know what the 2 black sections are
but I believe we are looking at the result of joining 5 pieces, of which 3 are
bone. I need to talk to an expert and I will let you know when and if I get any
better information. You will also notice the 2 white dots on the right side,
and I think that these are small pieces of ivory or mother of pearl. Again ??
I have bought several tampers from a firm Wooden Bygones
and they describe this one as:-
“Bone pipe tamper carved in the form of a
woman’s leg, French. Made by a Prisoner
of War c1810.”
With the holes on the right of the boot, as are the two
white dots, this is a right leg and the height of the heel all add up to being
a lady’s boot. Right at the top below
the cross-hatching there is a thin band of orangery discolouration of the bone.
I think this could either be nicotine colouring from 200 years of tamping
tobacco (think nicotine-coloured fingers of smokers), or it could possibly be
due to constant exposure to heat (tobacco).
There is much of interest about this tamper, and considering it was carved/created by a
prisoner of war it all adds up to a very nice leg.
I suppose for No 3 leg that I bought at a fair in
Uttoxeter in 2016 the question is “What is it?”
At less than 2 inches, no hatching, no holes, no engraving it is one of
my legs that has no history.
The only sure fact is that it is Ivory, and the seller attributed it to 1850. Also with the heel, it must have been thought as a lady’s. Whilst it is in my tampers section, I must say that the business end was too small to be efficient for tamping. Having said that, 140 years ago, whilst ladies did smoke, pipes were very small without the diameter bowl that we think of today. So, Is possible!
No 4 is probably the oddest tamper in my collection. It is a
mixture of brass and treen, in this case the wood being considered as Oak. This
addition was again from the NEC with a date line of early nineteenth century.
The wood has been hand carved to look like plus-fours! Not quite sure why, but the foot carving enables the tamper to stand upright.
The ½ inch brass top is well cross hatched but is
proportionately much heavier than the 2 ½ inch wood. The brass section would as
with No 1 and No 5, be created in a mould with the hatching cut by machine.
We can be sure this is a man’s leg, but there is no other
identity, and in total it is a bit of a bodged end result!
Finally, the fifth leg is Bronze. Quite heavy for a
tamper, but very well designed.
This was bought pre-covid in 2018 at Stafford and said to
be dated 1880. (There is an awful lot of trust and questions about dates –
unless there is some provenance dates can only be attributed to a style and a
period – very like furniture. Dealers who quote say “late 19th
century” are hedging their bets and giving a 50-year span that an item would be
correctly described.)
Examining this Tamper, it is not cross hatched, which is
why some inexperienced dealers would say it is a seal. Could be. This one is
modelled on a hunter’s boot, and the position of the buttonholes makes it a
right leg, and the heels are so shallow as to be a man’s boot. Think back to
the Brass boot above – this one is solid and would be produced in a 2-part
mould. As I said it is heavy and would weigh in a
jacket pocket.
I have enjoyed writing about this block of 5, incorporating
5 different materials, and illustrating whether the creator carves/creates the
actual leg, or uses design skill in making the moulds. Leaves a few unanswered
questions as well!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment